<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Job Search on René Welches</title><link>https://blog.renewelches.com/tags/job-search/</link><description>Recent content in Job Search on René Welches</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:13:07 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.renewelches.com/tags/job-search/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Building an LLM-Powered Job Search Workflow with Claude and Obsidian</title><link>https://blog.renewelches.com/2026/04/09/llm-job-search-workflow/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.renewelches.com/2026/04/09/llm-job-search-workflow/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Job searching is, politely put, a lot of parallel state to manage. You&amp;rsquo;re tracking companies and job ads — including the recurring LinkedIn postings that all start to blur together — tailoring resumes, prepping for interviews with three different people at two different firms simultaneously, and trying to remember which version of your pitch you used with which recruiter. It&amp;rsquo;s a project management problem wearing a people problem disguise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I spent some time building a workflow to handle all of this with LLM assistance — first with Claude Projects, then evolving toward something more structured after coming across &lt;a href="https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f"&gt;Andrej Karpathy&amp;rsquo;s LLM Wiki idea&lt;/a&gt;. Here&amp;rsquo;s how it evolved, and why I think the &lt;a href="https://obsidian.md"&gt;Obsidian&lt;/a&gt;-plus-skills approach is genuinely better for this kind of work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>